deviant art





Login
Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour Lost Password?
Deviant Login
Shop
 Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
[x]

More from *nikhil in News

Featured in Groups:

Details

September 27, 2004
Link
Thumb

Statistics

Comments: 66
Favourites: 0
Views: 45 (0 today)
[x]
Adobe Systems Inc. plans to introduce a new format for digital photos tomorrow in an attempt to create an industry public standard to make the archiving and editing process compatible across all types of cameras and software.

Adobe, which dominates the photo editing market with its Photoshop products, is proposing that its new Digital Negative Specification, or DNG, becomes a universal standard for the raw format. The San Jose-based company is also launching a free software tool that will allow users to convert the raw formats from more than 65 cameras into the DNG format.

Raw photo files contain all the original information captured by a digital camera sensor before any in-camera processing occurs and thus gives users truer images and more flexibility when editing. By comparison, JPEG photo files are compressed images that suffer some data loss.

Complete Article: here
Download DNG plugin for Photoshop: here
Supported cameras: here
:icon:
Add a Comment:
 
:iconpleko:
Adobe can go make their own raw file system :puke:
this has bad news written all over it

i hope they dont *uck up the industry with this

leave canon and nikon file formats alone!!

--
Internet Romance Is For Ugly People.
Reply
:icon0xox0:
i read positives and negatives opinions , but let me tell you mine:

photoshop 8 ( or 7 and element with the raw plug in ) is the one and only software i know that can manage with most raw files and almost always faster and better than with the dedicated camera's soft

so i see no way for adobe to attempt a kind of M$ conspiracy with that new standart . they already have the best tool .
adobe is the one who can push the camera compagnies in the same direction to get one simple kind of raw . it may avoid the mess we re in actually , i m already sick enough with the smart media , compact flash SD card etc so i m really happy and confident , the next step i expect is that all softwares get the jpeg2000 stuff to save our modified file from the raw ( DNG ) file

--
i should write something clever here?
Reply
:iconmatterless:
What's wrong with PNG? Why can't they just use something that's already out and develop it further. Seems kind of a waste to create a whole new format. :\
Reply
:icon61dynamic:
DNG is a RAW file. PNG is a bitmap file. Huge difference.
Reply
:iconoubeji:
That sounds like a great idea! I'm glad someone came up with it.

--
----*
"Why is it when we talk to God we are praying, but when God talks to us we are put into the loony bin?"
----*
Reply
:iconanon-y-mouse:
From skimming the articles, it looks like it could be quite good stuff.


Would love to see something like this be adopted on professional quality equipment. The proprietary file types are just silly.

Definately in agreement with others who feel Adobe is best to be doing this. Camera manufacturers tend to not share with each other. Would have been nice to have around prior to the camera-raw plugin - having both nikon and olympus' plugins on my desktop at the time liked to conflict. ^^;

--
:: awake and ever-dreaming ::
Reply
:iconchu-:
well i`m happy working in fine quality jpg, not interested at all.

--
"This is the light of my soul, a sacred territory in wich no one may intrude. Aren`t you Lilin aware that your AT Field.. is merely that wall that encloses one`s mind?"

~materos *abstractdeviants ~la-ch ~argentinos *painters
Reply
:icon61dynamic:
You might want to reconsider. RAW is far better in quality than jpg.

Understanding Raw Files: [link]
Figuring Bit-Depth: [link]
Reply
:iconchu-:
seemless..

--
"This is the light of my soul, a sacred territory in wich no one may intrude. Aren`t you Lilin aware that your AT Field.. is merely that wall that encloses one`s mind?"

~materos *abstractdeviants ~la-ch ~argentinos *painters
Reply
:iconkroc:
Personally I don't like Adobe, PDF is the internet nightmare of today and Photoshop needs some serious lessons on usability (Can't dock the floats, what the hell is wrong with you people!?). It's likely that it'll become used widely in the professional market since all those geeky PSD users have gotta been seen to be 'l33t' amongst their friends - "I'll send it as a DNG", "A DNG?", "Where were you for the last hundred years, geez? <ego inflation>". But I can't see it being as widely supported as PNG as I'm sure adobe would like to keep control of the format to be used how they see fit. Though I must admit that storing pictures as JPGs on cameras is a fricking stupid idea, so I'm up for the DNG format.

--
camendesign.com—code is art
Reply
:icon:
Add a Comment: